Dealing with electricity first, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_generation
Not much is made of the fact that in the UK electricity generation has fallen 16.2% since 2005 (398.4 TWh in 2005 down to 333.9 TWh in 2018). This means that the market for electricity is declining and cannot support investment in new generation plants. The adoption of LED lighting and other energy saving measures should continue to reduce demand, easing the needed generation margin. The government has assumed that electrification of transport will increase demand, but this is unlikely to balance the reduction in demand from energy saving. There will have to be some replacement of ageing plants, so will this best be served by building centralised plants or lots of smaller, distributed plants?
If we distribute as much electrical generation as possible it subtracts from the load on the local network. In effect it makes use of the same wires. For example, the electricity from solar PV on an office block will subtract from its electrical input, such that the net load on the local distribution cables will be reduced.
So distributed energy is the antidote to having more big nuclear or big gas-fired power stations. It will make the march of huge power lines through the countryside unnecessary. For example, the twin EPRs under construction for Hinkley Point C (HPC) will require National Grid to spend ca. £1 billion to get the power up the Bristol Channel, while the twin EPRs as Sizewell C will mean routing pylons up the Stour valley. Distributed electricity, together with the adoption of energy saving appliances offers a more economic solution than building centralised nuclear power plants that take at least 10 years to build and cost a fortune.
The main source of local generation will be solar PV and wind generators, plus biomass combustion together with waste incineration and anaerobic digestion. By the end of the century there may be tidal, wave and sea current energy, but the oil, gas, the best of the coal and uranium will be uneconomically extracted and inadequate. By then we will have learned to live with less energy or failed to survive. In the interim small gas-fired generators tied in with industrial steam and heat generation will be the answer. Small modular reactors (SMRs) inland are an unlikely proposition as instead of seawater cooling, powered air condensers are suggested, which would be useless in a station blackout.
Anaerobic Digestion (AD) can contribute electricity and heat. Alternatively it
can generate enough electricity for internal use and export biogas, which
can be cleaned up and injected into the grid or to provide motive fuel when
compressed. It is fed with farm energy crops or food and industrial waste.
Unfortunately to make the case for nuclear power the government has stripped off
startup subsidies and applied revenue support instead for HPC.
There are now over a 100 anaerobic digestion plants in the UK, generating electricity and making use of the waste heat from the generators. Gas production from AD is already being added to the gas grid, providing the same distributed energy as electricity. If a suitable local injection point is unavailable the methane from an AD plant can be compressed into cylinders and transported to one that is available.
Dual fuel farm tractors are now available running on biogas/diesel mixtures, so a farm AD can provide a measure of self-sufficiency for agriculture. This cannot compete presently with red diesel.
The generators' business model is inappropriate for the current energy scenario where householders are applying solar PV to roofs and installing low energy appliances while increasing insulation. Investment in huge centralised power stations needs a rising volume of supply to match the overheads of interest payments and increasing fuel costs. The utilities need a new deal with raised standing charges to cover the reducing revenue from a falling demand while having to provide back-up network capacity.
Distributed energy can make use of the existing electrical wires and gas distribution pipes. State subsidies should encourage energy saving and the building of renewables as there is no benefit in constructing huge generating stations unable to supply a declining market.
© John Busby 28 July, 2019