Canada’s
tarsands (or oilsands)
Oilsands
production
Bitumen occurs naturally in the Canadian
State of Alberta in huge tarsands (or oilsands), which it is claimed hold some
1600 Gb (gigabarrels) of oil. Although the size of the deposit is huge, the
extraction rate is very low, yielding a low net energy contribution and carrying
heavy environmental costs. The deposits consist of sands
impregnated with bitumen, which are subject to “surface-mineable” or
“in-situ” extraction methods.
The surface-mining
recovery method involves massive
excavation, needed to remove the overburden and reach the oilsand, which
is then subjected to steam or hot water treatment and centrifuging to separate
the bitumen from the sand. The water, sand, fine clays and unseparated bitumen
are deposited in tailing ponds. The overburden and coarse sand from the tailing
ponds is stockpiled for later reclamation or used to build pond dykes.
The deposits are not homogenous and subtle variations make a big difference to the extraction viability. So far the maximum overburden thickness that can be removed economically is about 70 metres and only the more favourable sites have been developed.
The in-situ
recovery method is used where the oilsand occurs below 50 metres of overburden.
This requires a technique of slant drilling two boreholes into the deposits,
drilling through the overburden, then turning horizontally into the oilsand
layer. One borehole allows steam injection from the horizontal section of the
borehole into the oilsand to mobilise the bitumen for recovery through a second
horizontal borehole below the first, bringing it to the surface. Natural gas is
also injected to reduce the density of the bitumen as an aid to recovery through
the return borehole. This is known as Steam-assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) and
is being applied in four new locations. Other
in-situ techniques under development are cyclic steam stimulation (CSS),
pressure cyclic steam drive (PSCD) and pulse technology and vapour recovery
extraction (VAPEX).
Of the initial volumes "in-place" only 6% is mineable and though in areas under active development 66% of the cumulative production is from the mineable reserves, 82% of these remain.
The
recovered bitumen has then to be diluted for pumping
to plants for processing into synthetic crude
oil or for direct use as bitumen. The diluent is recovered
and recycled, and the bitumen is “coked” or hydrogenated to obtain
lower carbon molecules. It is then desulphurised to form a "sweet"
crude for normal refining.
The surface-mining method leaves a devastated landscape requiring reclamation. One of the major producers, Syncrude, in its sustainability report for 2006 indicates that an area of land cleared totals 19,973 hectares of which only 4,624 hectares has been reclaimed, which at the end of the project will require considerable energy to restore, when none may be available. The Syncrude 2004 sustainability report showed that of the energy gained in the synthetic crude oil produced, 26% is used in the extraction process in the form of natural gas, coke, diesel, electricity, jet fuel, petrol and propane. If the energy required to restore the unreclaimed land is taken into account, then in the excavation method around one-third of the net-energy in the synthetic crude oil is lost.
Syncrude
alone has "disturbed" round 20,000 hectares of land and so far has
reclaimed only 4,700 hectares, leaving a current backlog of over 15,000
hectares, which as the rate of reclamation fails to match the rate of
disturbance by a factor of 1 in 4, may mean that most of the land to be
"disturbed" will remain unrestored at the close of the
operation.
The
in-situ steam-assisted gravity drainage
recovery method also involves an energy loss. The recovery of the bitumen and
its upgrading to synthetic crude oil requires an input of natural gas, which is
used for steam generation and for the production of hydrogen for hydrotreatment.
To this must be added further gas for
electricity generation, meaning that a total of around 30% of the net-energy in the
synthetic crude oil is currently supplied in natural gas.
Both the mining and in-situ recovery
methods require considerable quantities of water. (Three barrels of water are
required to produce one barrel of bitumen.) The occurrence of droughts has
required operators to re-use some for process hot water, but water supplies are
likely to remain problematic.
Production in
2007 was 0.482 Gb of bitumen, 5% more than 2006, of which 60% was surface-mined and
40%
was in-situ. From the bitumen 0.251 Gb of synthetic crude oil was produced, 4.6%
more than in 2006, the
balance being sold as bitumen. The refineries in which the synthetic crude oil is blended
with normal feedstock are connected to a network of pipelines serving
both Canada and the USA. Crude bitumen is
diluted with pentanes for transporting from the tarsands to the refinery at
Edmonton and to markets outside Alberta, principally in the US, in which case
the diluent may not be returned.
The operators have included crude bitumen in
their production statistics; in reality only around half of the figures can be
claimed as synthetic crude oil. In 2007 the production of synthetic crude oil
totalled 0.251 Gb, 30% of the total Canadian crude oil consumption of 0.841 Gb,
but only 0.81% of global consumption of 31.1 Gb, compared to that produced by Saudi
Arabia of 12.2%.
Oilsands
reserves
The Alberta Energy Resources and Conservation Board (ERCB) estimates that 173 Gb of bitumen remains in established reserves, from which with a yield of 85% around 147 Gb of synthetic crude oil is recoverable, from claimed initial volume “in-place” reserves of 1712 Gb. This has ranked Canada second only to Saudi Arabia, which claims reserves of 264 Gb.
However, the synthetic crude oil
produced from the recoverable bitumen will be limited by the amount of natural
gas available. Of the energy in the synthetic crude oil produced 30 % is
required in the extraction of the bitumen and for its upgrading. If this energy
is obtained solely from natural gas (as it is at present), the recovery of 147
Gb of synthetic crude oil from 173 Gb of bitumen would consume 30% of its energy in natural gas, which
is around 8.35 tm3 (trillion cubic metres).
North American natural gas reserves
Canada’s natural gas reserves and its production and consumption of the same are inexorably linked with the USA and Mexico by a gas pipeline network. This is illustrated by the following table:-
|
2007 |
Gas reserves tm³ |
Production tm³ |
Production
% |
Depletion
rate % |
Consumption tm³ |
Consumption % |
|
USA |
5.98 |
0.5459 |
70 |
9.1 |
0.6529 |
81.5 |
|
Canada |
1.63 |
0.1837 |
24 |
11.3 |
0.0940 |
11.7 |
|
Mexico |
0.37 |
0.0462 |
6 |
12.5 |
0.0541 |
6.8 |
|
Total |
7.98 |
0.7758 |
100 |
9.7 |
0.801 |
100 |
The
above shows the fragility of Canada’s natural gas supplies,
with half of its production crossing the border to supply the USA. Demand for natural gas in North America
is set to rise in line with economic growth, bringing the future of gas supplies
sharply into focus.
This is leading to a growing dependence on imported liquid natural gas from projects such as Shell’s Sakhalin venture in Eastern Russia. Shell’s project involves an overland pipeline from the gas field to an ice-free harbour to the South of the island, cryogenic liquefaction for transport in special gas tanker ships and off-loading and gasification facilities on the American West coast. This overspent project will provide 9.6 million tonnes (0.0132 tm3) of gas per annum, but represents only 2% of the US consumption.
In consequence of this complexity, the delivery costs will raise the price of networked gas when supplemented by liquid natural gas. But of more significance is that as supplies of crude oil decline, natural gas might be better employed in producing liquid fuels directly in gas-to-liquids processes.
The global industry is turning to
natural gas for synthesis of petrol, diesel and jet fuel. Indigenous gas
production will be supplemented by importing liquid natural gas: to use some of
this to extract bitumen from underground and upgrade it to synthetic
crude oil for subsequent refining into liquid fuels, rather than convert the gas
directly to liquid fuels does not seem to be optimal.
Assuming that 10% of the USA and Canada’s remaining natural gas could be earmarked for oilsands synthetic crude oil extraction, i.e., 0.80 tm3 - only 15 Gb of synthetic crude oil could be extracted from the oilsands reserves by its use. For comparison, the USA, Canada and Mexico together consumed 9.13 Gb of crude oil in 2007 - i.e., the recoverable oilsands synthetic crude limited by gas availability would provide only 1 ½ year's crude oil consumption in the North American market.
Because of the increasing awareness of the significance of natural gas usage in tarsands exploitation, there are proposals for the building of a nuclear power plant to provide steam and electricity for the production of hydrogen by electrolysis of water as a substitute. It is also hoped that a proposed Mackenzie pipeline will provide additional gas from Canada's North West territories to feed into the North Western Alberta pipeline system to increase its availability for tarsands synthetic crude oil extraction.
The way
forward may be to use more of the bitumen as a source of heat. Another in-situ
recovery method utilises the direct underground combustion of the bitumen.
Oxygen or air is injected into the oilsands layer to burn some of the bitumen in
order to bring other bitumen to the surface. There would still be the need for
hot water for separation from the sand and for hydrogen (from methane) for
upgrading to synthetic crude oil. This method is under development.
The upgrading of Canada’s reserves to rank it second in the world is therefore unwarranted. In any case, if synthetic crude is included in the oil reserves figure, global natural gas proven reserves should be reduced by 8.35 tm³ (from 177.36 tm³ to 169.01 tm³) to take into account the energy loss associated with the production of 147 Gb of synthetic crude oil.
John
Busby Revised 22 September 2008
Title page of The Busby Report